Altera Home Page
Literature Licensing
Buy On-Line Download

  Home   |   Products   |   Support   |   End Markets   |   Technology Center   |   Education & Events   |   Corporate   |   Buy On-Line  
  Auto   |   Broadcast   |   Computer & Storage   |   Consumer   |   Industrial   |   Medical   |   Military   |   Test & Measurement   |   Wireless   |   Wireline  

 Test & Meas. End Market
   Industry Trends
      Comm. Test & Monitoring
      Semiconductor ATE
      General Purpose Instruments
  
 Test & Meas. Applications
   Architectures
          Chassis
          Modular
          Portable
  
 Test & Meas. Resources
      Consortia & Standards
  

Chassis-Based Architecture

Large automated test equipment (ATE) and communication test systems have used chassis implementations that:

  • Provide equipment options to integrated device manufacturers and integrated test houses, with flexibility, scalability, and longevity for the widest variety of devices under test (DUTs)
  • Accelerate complex hardware and software development across multiple platforms, teams, and locations
  • Easily upgrade functionality for emerging protocols

ATE requires many instrument cards to provide the functionality and extreme pin density needed to simultaneously test multiple memory devices or to test complex system-on-chip (SOC) DUTs. Communication testers use multiple line interface cards to generate and analyze traffic for evaluating large routers and switches.  These subsystems must:

  • Accommodate multiple cards for pin electronics, formatting, sequencing, and timing analysis
  • Provide backplane structures with special timing, control, and data transfer capabilities (historically proprietary)

Now you can implement chassis backplane architectures (see Figure 1) using standardized serial implementations with integrated gigabit transceivers (e.g., PCI Express (PCIe), LXI, and IEEE1588) on Stratix® II GX FPGAs, that allow:

  • Significantly increased subsystem data transfer rates and advanced timing capabilities
  • Lower development costs and a smaller equipment footprint
  • Higher pin densities per FPGA component, while lowering platform power requirements 

Figure 1. Chassis-Based Architectures

Figure 1. Chassis-Based Architectures

 

  Please Give Us Feedback