Altera Home Page
Literature Licensing
Buy On-Line Download

  Home   |   Products   |   Support   |   End Markets   |   Technology Center   |   Education & Events   |   Corporate   |   Buy On-Line  
  Devices   |   Design Software   |   Intellectual Property   |   Design Services   |   Dev. Kits/Cables   |   Literature  

 High-End FPGAs
      About Stratix Series
   Stratix IV (E and GX)
   Stratix III (L and E)
   Stratix II (and GX)
   Stratix (and GX)
  
 Midrange FPGAs
   Arria (GX)
  
 Low-Cost FPGAs
   Cyclone III
   Cyclone II
   Cyclone
  
 CPLDs
   MAX II (and G, Z)
       Overview
               Architecture
               Power
               Unique Features
          Applications
          Design Resources
          Literature
          Getting Started
   MAX 3000A
  
 ASICs
      About HardCopy Series
   HardCopy IV (E and GX)
   HardCopy III
   HardCopy II
   HardCopy Stratix
  
 Device-Specific Offerings
   Lead-Free
      Extended Temperature
      Industrial Temperature
      Military Temperature
      Automotive Temperature
  
 Configuration Devices
   Enhanced Configuration
   Serial Configuration
  
 Mature Products
      Product Listing
  

Low-Power MAX II CPLDs

Since its introduction, Altera’s MAX® II CPLD family has shown a strong commitment to low power applications. Continuing this commitment is the new zero-power MAX IIZ, which combines the industry’s lowest dynamic power consumption, with the industry’s lowest standby power consumption. With the introduction of the zero-power MAX IIZ CPLD, Altera delivers the lowest static and dynamic power in the CPLD industry. Altera® CPLDs enable you to maximize functionality, while minimizing power consumption.

Low power applications are proliferating as demand increases for small, inexpensive products that support high levels of functionality with extended battery life. Table 1 shows some end markets with a need for low power.

Table 1. End Markets Requiring Low Power
Markets Applications
Consumer
  • Educational toys
  • Portable media players
  • Smart phones
Industrial
  • POS scanners
  • Industrial PDAs
  • Camera modules
Medical
  • Portable diagnostics
Test and Measurement
  • Multimeters
  • Portable diagnostics
Wireless and Wireline
  • PCMCIA cards
  • Optical modules
  • Cellular handsets
Automotive
  • Mobile GPS
  • Mobile infotainment systems

MAX IIZ Low-Power CPLD

The MAX IIZ low-power CPLD offers a power-down capability to further conserve battery life. Designed from the ground up to deliver low power, MAX IIZ CPLDs have many power saving system characteristics, including hot-socketing capability, power-sequence flexibility, and single power supply simplicity.

Standby (Static) Power Consumption

Table 2 shows the standby current consumption for the MAX IIZ CPLD family. As shown, MAX IIZ CPLDs provide ultra-low standby power consumption, making them ideal for portable applications design where battery life must be maximized.

Table 2. MAX IIZ CPLD DC Characteristics

Device

VCCINT Standby Current

VCCIO Standby Current

Typical (1)

Maximum (2)

Typical (1)

Maximum (2)

EPM240Z

29 µA

150 µA

2 µA

10 µA

EPM570Z

32 µA

210 µA

4 µA

10 µA

  Notes:

  1. At 25°C, VCCINT = VCCIO = VIPIN = 1.8 V
  2. At 70°C, VCCINT = VCCIO = VIPIN = 1.8 V

Dynamic Power Consumption

Unlike traditional macrocell-based CPLD architectures, MAX IIZ low-power CPLDs do not use sense amps that require bias currents to amplify signal voltages within the device. Additionally, with Quartus® II software, efficient implementation of most interconnects with local routing in MAX IIZ CPLDs significantly lowers dynamic power. Figure 1 graphs the typical power consumption (mWatts) versus frequency for the MAX IIZ EPM240Z CPLDs. Similar graphs for all MAX II CPLD family members can be found in the Understanding & Evaluating Power in MAX II Devices (PDF) chapter of  the MAX II Device Handbook.

Figure 1. Power Consumption Versus Frequency for MAX II EPM240Z CPLDs (1)(2)

Figure 1. Power Consumption Versus Frequency for MAX II EPM240Z Devices

Notes:

  1. The typical operating conditions are at 25°C.
  2. Each device is fully utilized with 16-bit counters.

MAX IIZ CPLD Versus CoolRunner-II Power Consumption

Figure 2 shows the dynamic power consumption of the MAX IIZ CPLD compared to a CoolRunner-II traditional macrocell-based CPLD. As shown, the MAX IIZ CPLD provides significantly lower power consumption at every performance level.

Figure 2. MAX IIZ CPLD Versus CoolRunner-II, Dynamic Power Consumption

Figure 2. MAX IIZ Device Versus CoolRunner-II, Dynamic Power Consumption

Automatic Power-Down Capability

To achieve the absolute lowest power, it is ideal if a device consumed no power when it was not being used. This is achievable in MAX IIZ CPLDs because, unlike traditional macrocell-based CPLDs, MAX IIZ CPLDs contain an internal oscillator, which can be used to build an automatic power-down capability.

MAX IIZ automatic power-down operation is simple (Figure 3). All of the inputs to the MAX IIZ CPLD control a counter. If any input is active, the counter is held in reset. When all of the inputs go inactive, the counter counts for a user-defined length of time. If during this time all of the inputs remain inactive, a signal is sent to disable a MOSFET, which shuts off power to the MAX IIZ CPLD. When any input goes active again, the internal counter is reset, power is enabled, and the MAX IIZ CPLD powers up. For more information on the power-down capability in MAX IIZ CPLDs, refer to the MAX II Power-Down Design Example page.

Figure 3. MAX IIZ CPLD Automatic Power-Down Capability

Figure 3. MAX IIZ Device Automatic Power-Down Capability

Figure 4 shows the power consumption of the MAX IIZ CPLD, compared to a CoolRunner-II traditional macrocell-based CPLD, when both devices are powered off. This application example assumes 50 percent of inputs are at VCC and 50 percent of inputs are at GND when the CPLD's VCCINT and VCCIO are powered down. As shown, the leakage current through the I/O pins on the CoolRunner-II device results in significantly more power dissipation when the device is powered off compared to the MAX IIZ device. This is because, unlike traditional macrocell-based CPLDs, multiple I/O pins at VCC or GND have little effect on the MAX IIZ CPLD's power dissipation when powered off.

Figure 4. MAX IIZ CPLD Versus CoolRunner-II When Power Is Off

Figure 4. MAX IIZ Device Versus CoolRunner-II When Power Is Off

Related Links

  Please Give Us Feedback