Altera Home Page
Literature Licensing
Buy On-Line Download

  Home   |   Products   |   Support   |   End Markets   |   Technology Center   |   Education & Events   |   Corporate   |   Buy On-Line  
  Devices   |   Design Software   |   Intellectual Property   |   Design Services   |   Dev. Kits/Cables   |   Literature  

 High-End FPGAs
      About Stratix Series
   Stratix IV (E and GX)
   Stratix III (L and E)
   Stratix II (and GX)
       Stratix II
               Overview
               Design Utilities
               Features
               Literature
       Stratix II GX
   Stratix (and GX)
  
 Midrange FPGAs
   Arria (GX)
  
 Low-Cost FPGAs
   Cyclone III
   Cyclone II
   Cyclone
  
 CPLDs
   MAX II (and G, Z)
   MAX 3000A
  
 ASICs
      About HardCopy Series
   HardCopy IV (E and GX)
   HardCopy III
   HardCopy II
   HardCopy Stratix
  
 Device-Specific Offerings
   RoHS Compliant
      Extended Temperature
      Industrial Temperature
      Military Temperature
      Automotive Temperature
  
 Configuration Devices
   Enhanced Configuration
   Serial Configuration
  
 Mature Products
      Product Listing
  

Stratix II vs. Virtex-4 Open Core Density Benchmark

Publicly available open core designs provide a good comparison of FPGA densities. A total of 25 of these open core designs, obtained from www.opencores.org, were used to benchmark Stratix® II and Virtex-4 density. The open core density benchmark result is the same as the result obtained by benchmarking real customer designs. It provides further proof that designers can fit more logic in a Stratix II FPGA than a similarly named Virtex-4 device. Figure 1 shows a Stratix II versus Virtex-4 logic density comparison based on the density benchmark result.

Figure 1. Stratix II vs. Virtex-4 Logic Density Comparison

Figure 1. Stratix II vs. Virtex-4 Logic Density Comparison

Open Core Benchmark Details

The 25 open core designs were selected based on their popularities and they are all written in generic hardware description languages (HDLs). To provide a fair comparison, no manual optimization of the design code is done except for getting the designs to compile and making the RAM modules to target both FPGA architectures. The designs are synthesized using Synplify Pro software version 8.0 and compiled using Quartus® II software version 5.0 or ISE software version 7.1i service pack 1. Similar to the customer design benchmark, the open core designs are compiled for minimum area while targeting fixed performance. Figure 2 shows the result of the open core density benchmark.

Figure 2. Stratix II ALM vs. Virtex-4 Slice Open Core Benchmark

Figure 2. Stratix II ALM vs. Virtex-4 Slice Open Core Benchmark

The adaptive logic module (ALM) is the basic logic structure of Stratix II while the slice is the basic logic structure of Virtex-4. The open core density benchmark result shows that, on average, one Stratix II ALM is equivalent to 1.3 Virtex-4 slices and, therefore, designers can fit more logic in Stratix II than Virtex-4. This is the same as the result obtained through the real customer design benchmark.

Run Your Own Density Benchmark

Designers can make their own density comparison using the publicly available open core designs. For Stratix II, use the Quartus II area optimization settings shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Quartus II Area Optimization Options

Options

Setting

Perform WYSIWYG Resynthesis

On

Optimization Technique

Area

Restructure Multiplexers

On

Auto Packed Registers

Minimize Area With Chains

 
Stratix II vs. Virtex-4 Density Comparison

The Industry’s Biggest FPGAs

Fit More in Stratix II Sparkle Sheet



  Please Give Us Feedback