Hero Banner image

Why FPGAs?

Compare Architectures

ArchitectureBest ForFPGA RelationshipTrade-offs
CPUGeneral-purpose sequential processing, complex software stacksFPGAs offload parallel and real-time workloads; SoC FPGAs combine both on one dieLimited parallelism; OS scheduling adds latency
GPUHigh-throughput AI training, large-scale parallel computeFPGAs handle deterministic inference and protocol processing; often co-deployed in the same pipelineHigh power envelope; fixed architecture; not suited for real-time control
ASICVery high-volume, fixed-function designs with frozen requirementsFPGAs reduce mask NRE, enable in-field updates, and support faster iteration cyclesLong development timelines; high NRE cost; cannot be updated post-fabrication
ASSPDefined markets with standard functions (networking, wireless, video)FPGAs add custom logic, bridge protocols, and adapt to evolving standards alongside ASSPsFixed feature set; limited differentiation beyond the ASSP's defined scope
FPGA Real-time determinism, parallel data paths, in-field reconfigurability, evolving standardsComplements and accelerates every architecture in this tableHigher per-unit cost than ASIC at very high volumes; HDL design expertise required (mitigated by HLS and AI Suite)